Program Overview
India’s rural agricultural landscape is home to legacy Agri institutions, a large civil society and a farm-supportive government. Moreover, the historical policy push to adopt scientific and technological innovations from the world is now being complimented by a new generation of Agri innovators and entrepreneurs who are building indigenous innovations suited for Indian farms. However, despite these trends and chronology, millions of small farmers living on more than 125 million small and marginal land holdings in India, continue to face extreme financial, technological and climate-induced challenges.
The India Agritech Incubation Network (IAIN) is a collaborative effort between the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Social Alpha. It aims to establish a conducive ecosystem for innovators and entrepreneurs in agriculture. The network has fostered cooperation among private and public sector stakeholders, created specialised technical infrastructure, provided market access, influenced public policy and facilitated market access for early-stage innovative solutions. The diversity of innovations spans pre-cultivation technologies for soil & crop health, inclusive farm equipment for drudgery-cost-risk reduction, post-harvest technologies for loss elimination, and allied sector innovations for building income resilience. IAIN was conceived and designed to bring science and technology innovations to small and marginal farmers and help improve their productivity, income and quality of life.
Focus Areas
- Drudgery & Labour Equity: Labour intensive operations in cash crop farming such as sowing/planting, input application, inter-cultivation, and harvesting results in high dependence on manual labour and higher cultivation cost due to labour scarcity and limited operating time.
- Innovative solutions that can improve the utilisation efficiency of agriculture inputs.
- Unavailability: Lack of appropriately designed equipment that meet the needs of small and marginal farmers, especially women.
- Affordability: High capital expenditure and operating costs due to fossil fuel dependency make small farm mechanisation economically unviable, thereby limiting its adoption by small and marginal farmers.
- Misselection and unbalanced application of chemical inputs has weakened the rhizosphere & soil biome diversity, thus leading to low symbiotic exchange of organic matter between soil and crops.
- Over reliance on synthetic farm inputs has disrupted carbon cycles on farms creating suboptimal yields with high costs.
- Intensive farming & climate change have degraded the soil carbon pool & soil structure, thus impacting biological & hydrological efficiency of the soil.
- In the absence of alternative incentives systems that can cushion risks, farmers see no merit/need to participate in ‘Good for soil organic carbon’ practices.
- There is a lack of reliable, easy and economically viable tools to calculate carbon fractions, thus limiting incentives for farmers for regenerative carbon practices.
- Limited price for lower grade produce (in perishables) impacts farm incomes. There is need of decentralised technologies to create market linked value-added products from low grade produce.
- Loss of weight & quality of perishable commodities due to moisture loss, rotting and sprouting leads to lower price realisation.
- Seasonality and non-availability of green fodder, along with the overall decline in green fodder production increases fodder cost.
- The lack of region-specific and breed-specific feed options for cattle is resulting in the widespread use of generalised feed formulations, leading to detrimental impacts on production yield and animal health.
- Non availability of screening and diagnostic tools for identifying health and nutrition deficiencies leads to generic, misaligned and non-scientific supplement prescriptions.
- Concentrate feed prices are increasing YoY due to raw material shortage and inflation. Access and affordability are limited to 30% farmers who are organised via cooperatives.
- NTFP: Low productivity, disease & climate stress impacts NTFP yield resulting in low incomes and unsustainable practices.
- NTFP: Due to lack of value preservation & value addition of NTFPs, PGs receive a mere 25% portion of the overall value while intermediaries claim an excessive 75% share.
- Forest fires: Accumulation of dry biomass on forest floor increases the bio-fuel load which combined with heat stress triggers forest fires.
MEET THE COHORT
- AlteReFebruary 28, 2024AlteRe
- EcosightFebruary 28, 2024Ecosight
- F3 BiotechnologyFebruary 28, 2024F3 Biotechnology
- Gangpur VenturesFebruary 28, 2024Gangpur Ventures
- Shree Marut E-AgrotechFebruary 28, 2024Shree Marut E-Agrotech